![]() London to Edinburgh, 1888 įrom 1885 the main London to Edinburgh services were as follows. Although the press hoped for a new "Race", nothing came of it. East Coast responded by speeding up and West Coast briefly joined in. In 1901, the Midland Railway and North British Railway ran an accelerated London St Pancras to Edinburgh Waverley express. Indeed, after some 500 miles from London, the two routes converged to being in sight of each other just before Kinnaber Junction from where there was a single track to Aberdeen. In 1895 a second "race" broke out but this time with the added excitement of arriving at the same station in Aberdeen. Caledonian already had a route connecting Carlisle and Aberdeen via Stirling and Perth. Although NBR owned the track from further south at Berwick-on-Tweed, NER had running rights to Edinburgh. īy the 1890s, an east coast route had been established further north through Scotland over the Forth and Tay bridges allowing the North British Railway (NBR) to provide a reasonably direct Edinburgh to Aberdeen service so as to extend the East Coast consortium's King's Cross to Scotland route. In 1888, driven by commercial rivalry, the East Coast and West Coast consortia started competing fiercely over the speed of their express services over these two routes. At the "borders" between these companies' territories – York and Carlisle – locomotives were always changed (and they were generally changed at intermediate points also) but passengers did not necessarily have to change carriage. ![]() The companies each had territories where they owned the track or had legally enforcible running rights on some other tracks. Great Northern Railway (GNR) and North Eastern Railway (NER) ran the East Coast service with London & North Western Railway (LNWR) and Caledonian Railway (CR) on the West Coast. By the 1880s two consortia in particular provided services between London and Edinburgh using separate routes on the east and west coasts of Britain terminating in London at King's Cross and Euston stations, and in Edinburgh at Waverley and Princes Street stations. For the first time long-distance rail travel could be afforded by the general public. Gradually merger and other formal agreements were made so that travel across the country became feasible. The late nineteenth century was a boom time for the railways in Britain with many independent companies operating but with poor coordination between the companies' lines. In the 20th century there were also occasions of competition for speed on the two routes.īackground East and west coast railway routes at the time of the "Races" ![]() Results were not announced officially and the outcomes have since been hotly debated. The "races" were never official and publicly the companies denied that what happened was racing at all. The Race to the North was the name given by the press to occasions in two summers of the late 19th century when British passenger trains belonging to different companies would literally race each other from London to Edinburgh over the two principal rail trunk routes connecting the English capital city to Scotland – the West Coast Main Line which runs from London Euston via Crewe and Carlisle and the East Coast Main Line route from London King's Cross via York and Newcastle. The image shows the top section of the full report. Main news item in the Glasgow Herald, 23 August 1895. ![]() Not to be confused with Top Gear Race to the North.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |